Friday, January 2, 2015

Example of Psychological Counter Strategy


0.0.1 Counter Strategy

Here is an example of counter strategy - not playing the percentages and likely hand ranges like everyone teaches but instead playing player psychology. A tight Russian player raises from early. There is a middle caller who’s also a regular. I look down at  









 I am in the small blind so I think about calling. I recognize the first aggressor is normally tight so I don’t position reraise. I just call to see the flop and hope for a monster.









 




Naturally I am ahead of both players with the nuts. I know that tight Russian #1 might have a pair of aces. Other player has unknown since he was calling. I am sure if first aggressor has aces that he will lay them down to protect his stack if he thinks he'’s behind. 
 

There is a flush draw so I want to protect my hand. But more importantly, I want to trick them into thinking I am bluffing. There are two spades and the most likely play is reraise with two spades. Now, here is the psychology. The tendency is to protect an overpair. The tendency of all these pros is to assume the player has flush draw with an all-in. And the most important tendency is: someone goes all-in on a draw only and not a made hand. They always assume someone is bluffing if they go all in. If you had a made hand you would not want to push people off the pot. That makes them blind to the possibility that they are beaten. 


I am in the small blind to I am first to act.

I lead into the pot 60%.

That bet leads to a pot-sized reraise from the first aggressor. The middle player also calls which is confusing but OK.

Without much time, I reraise both of them all-in. That also looks suspicious, I am acting in the way they expect but not in the way they think.

The tight Russian calls without thinking. The other pro thinks about it for a moment and calls as well.

That was the entire hand, the rest is unimportant. Whether or not I win this hand, the point is I got two professional players to commit their stacks on the wrong impression. They turn over their hands. They made a wrong decision and were the ones behind, but were made to think they were ahead.

Tight Russian has  
  and the other hapless pro has
so at least he was drawing to win. But he's a 30% at best.  This is how you can triple up against "good" players.  It's not about ranges in any one hand, it's about out thinking them. They do the same action over and over and over. They aren't even thinking anymore.

Tight Russian is drawing dead. Hapless pro is drawing to the full house. Board runs out: 

I tripled up






      ♢

Get a chip lead, then go conservative

I was watching a rerun of the old 2013 NBC National Heads Up Championship, and it occured to me that Liv Boeree has forgotten how to play the cards at all.  She ran up a huge lead by aggression, which was well deserved apart from a flopped full house.  But then instead of tending the three to one chip lead she continued to make aggressive moves on her opponent.  She didn't need to.

And then she ran into on better hand and lost.

The reality in online poker is you make moves to get ahead and limit the chances you will be eliminated, then you sit on that lead until you get the cards to put your opponent away. 

Making moves when you are ahead is a pure luck play, you can't win every hand. That's why you need to make moves to begin with. But that's not the way to win.

Friday, July 25, 2014

Counter Strategies are viable strategies

If you are wondering how to beat people at poker, one way that doesn't take a lot of effort is to change the way you play.  I write about this in my book here.

http://pokerdaemon.blogspot.com/2014/06/superior-texas-hold.html



So if you are playing a player that you think plays a certain way, then look up how to play against that person and use that strategy.  It's that easy, pretend you are acting and assume the role.  Fish against a shark.  Act like a landmine against a Maniac. And so on....

Play that session like you looked at the game differently.

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Worst Vegas Poker Weekend

I play in Las Vegas every June for one weekend.  This year I played at the WSOP hosted at the Rio hotel off the strip.  I go to play poker against weaker players.  My wife goes to attend the IBS International Beauty Show for hairstylists and estheticians. We stay at a new hotel every time, this time we stayed at the Las Vegas Hotel.

Vegas is a busy crazy place, but this weekend in June, this year the 21,22,23 June 2014 was an especially crazy one. Its a big party weekend too with the Electric Daisy Carnival going on at the Las Vegas Speedway. 

My friend did great at the WSOP, won two $1500 sit & go tournaments. 

Me, worst poker weekend ever.   WhyÉ I lost 5 80-20 decisions in a row to bad players.   Ièm not calling them bad because they beat me, Ièm calling them bad because they had to get extremely lucky to win.  If I flop the nut straight and another player goes all in with two pair - not the top two pair but Queens and Eights against straight eight through Queen, he should not be surprised when he gets called and is behind.  How was he even sure he was ahead with two pair.  Itès kind of madness.

The topping on the cake was I lost pocket Queens against two Aces and lost on the turn.
Two aces, guy reraises me with Ace King - another guy calls with Ace Ten.  Ace Ten! For his tournament life.  I mean bad play.  Wait for a better spot.  He should read my book!  

He knew someone was going out that hand, so why call with a weak ace.  Just watch the field get smaller.

  Worst. Poker. Weekend. ever.

Ill be back next year same time to win it all back.


Thursday, June 26, 2014

Superior Texas Hold'em: Evolved Poker Strategy

Ok;

After a few years working on it, my first poker book is done.

It's available on Google Play right now:Superior Texas Hold'em



It is long and comprehensive.  I will talk about it in my future posts, making examples as I go.  Once I figure out EPUB, I will convert to that as well.

Please tell me what you think, I'll fix what I can.
  Superior Texas Hold'em: Evolved Poker Strategy

Monday, December 23, 2013

Hungarian Uber Donk #1

Here is my first Hungarian Uber Donk: paplan666
Playing a $1 buy-in 6-handed NLHE tournament on PokerStars, I'm about mid pack with 10015 in chips and big stack paplan666 with 34913 in chips raises from under the gun 3 big blinds. He's a tight player, probably because that's his skill level, so I'm looking for a monster flop with my bad hand:
K♣

♣

♣T
7♥

♥

♥7

I flop that monster: [Ks Kd 2s 9h] [Qc]
K♠

♠

♠K
K♦

♦

♦K
2♠

♠

♠2

Ok, other than Ace King which is a distinct possibility given his hand range, I'm beating everything. I've got him right where I want him. I've been playing 50% of my hands so I will get him to bite if he's behind. But just in case I'm losing and to set the trap, I check. Well he bets out about a third of the pot. Now, if I had Ace King, I'm not betting shit in position, I have the absolute nuts. Betting is pointless, you are going to scare off worse hands. You want them to call when you have the nuts. Now I know he doesn't have Ace King.The board looks bluffy with two spades so I do the ol' insta check raise all-in.
To his credit, he stops and thinks about it, but not really all that long. And assuming I might be bluffing and given he's got 20,000 more chips than me he calls. He calls with pocket nines!
Moron! I'm risking my tournament life before the money bubble. At best he's a slight favorite to suited four flush if I have the Ace of spades. But he's no sure winner here. I played so loose and aggressive it worked. And if he was paying attention, I only reraise with the nuts. There's nothing more nuts-like than three of a kind! Based on this information only he should fold. It's not smart to risk his chip dominance against a tricky player. But stupid buys it on a 7% hand. Literally 7% to win. Who's the idiot here?
Of course the board runs out and he wins:
K♣

♣

♣T
7♥

♥

♥7

I flop that monster: [Ks Kd 2s 9h] [Qc]
K♠

♠

♠K
K♦

♦

♦K
2♠

♠

♠2
9♥

♥

♥9
Q♣

♣

♣Q

So congratulations, paplan666, you've officially become the first patented uberbonk! Well played. I'm seriously thinking of changing the Pokerstars motto to : " Bad players, playing badly and getting rewarded for it."

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

The power of representation

Steve Silverman, a professional player with millions in poker earnings, still doesn't know the power of representation:

Steve is short stacked, about 10 big blinds at 3,000 / 6,000 1000 ante at the Spanish High Roller $50,000. He was a chip leader, played some hands poorly and got himself in a bind with blinds going up and his stack decreasing. He looks down at

T♥

♥

♥T
9♥

♥

♥9

in middle position, as first aggressor he goes all in for his remaining 33,000 chips. In the small blind, a Norwegian named Jensen calls with
K♠

♠

♠T
J♦

♦

♦J

Jensen calls all-in, there is 79,000 chips in the pot and he gets to see the hole cards. The flop comes down:
4♠

♠

♠4
5♥

♥

♥5
4♥

♥

♥4

Silverman shoved all in pre-flop. The board ran out and he didn't improve and he was eliminated short of the money bubble. Now replay the hand in your head, as Jensen, if Silverman had just raised 3* the big blinds, got a call from Jensen and THEN shoved on the flop.
Imagine you are Jensen. You have King Jack, not even Ace high, your opponent raises and then on this flop that missed you - and you must act first on out of position - the short stack goes all in.

4♠

♠

♠4
5♥

♥

♥5
4♥

♥

♥4

Go through Jensen's thought process. The all-in player could have an ace, he could have an overpair, he could even have 2 hearts. In all those cases, a King is a statistical underdog to win the hand. Remember this is a tournament you paid $50,000 to play and you don't want to double up short stacks if you can help it that just gives him more chances to get back in the game. You want to step on his neck and eliminate him!
Of course, with blinds so high it's possible that Jensen calls the all-in bet regardless because there is so little more to lose it's worth the risk. But because Silverman doesn't use the power of representation he didn't get the chance to put doubt in the mind of Jensen and didn't give himself every chance to win the hand. Even pros play sub-optimally, he's still not an expert!